Does the Theory of Knowledge need to be reasonable?

When playing the game ‘mastermind’ in class I can make some connections when scaling the ideas up to the scale of magnitude that covers the whole entire world. The first aspect to talk about is about the idea of if the leader was nature the players in the game won’t they be essentially anything with a soul, it's not so much watching scientists struggle to make sense of observations but more so to create the observations for people to see. And the code created by nature that is the observation it dictates, it waits then on people to discover that sight, its nothing really to figure out but it is something we can eventually observe by chance or just pure luck. The role of the hypothesis is to formulate an accurate thought when we think we are accustomed to the if… then… because… the format of a question, where based on the past, the next move is... because of the feedback from ‘the world’. Then it becomes a trial and error play until the desired outcome is eventually achie

NASA is preparing to send a manned mission to Mars , over the 6-month journey to the red planet NASA intends to put the crew of 5 people into a deep hibernation sleep for 180 days out of the 6months of travel. Although this will encounter several ethical limitations concerning essentially taking away 5months of someone’s life, while in transit to another planet. Initial proposals presented the idea of sending manned missions to Mars with the intention of remaining there for the rest of their lives. In that instance, the people have already chosen to give up their lives for exploration. Then talking 5 months to waste doesn’t look so bad and then, until the astronauts decide not to work anymore and at that point, they certainly do become a waste of life potential.   This scheme while highly debatable will be pursued by scientists. They should because as humans we have a need to satisfy curiosity and for us to gather new information about the universe we live in. while peopl