Blog #11 - Ethics Wrap Up


Dilemma:

You work in an office space where you have been in the same role for the past 6 years, you realized you can get the boss fired and take his place, your pay would skyrocket but at the same time, you would not be able to maintain standards and the company will fail. You would get the biggest compensation of $500, 000 but everyone else in the company would have to walk away empty-handed and jobless. What would you do?

Devine Command Theory: this is a concept where you do what would be wanted by a supreme power that is tied to religion, faith, and beliefs. We understand that in this case, the company would be out of business, but that company may be forcing people into acts they do not believe in and that we can consider that there is the reason for the current boss to be thrown out.

Unilateralism: the idea that wants the greatest amount of good for the most amount of people. Obviously, if you do become the boss and everyone loses their jobs does not sound like a good idea. Assuming the company is a group of 10people than you can divide your new wealth by 10 and everyone gets $50, 000 people or even a 100 people were in the company then everyone got $10,000. Still, this money is enough for everyone to live for a little while.

Deontology: the idealism that if everyone did such a thing how would the world be, assuming that you get the man fired, the world's economies would fall, as with such consequences companies will begin to drop like the plague and soon everyone will be out of jobs the suddenly when all their severance get used, there will be no economy. Then if we all stayed quiet and let our managers do whatever they want, they will be able to exploit their position and suck every penny they can out of a company. Everything will soon become like capitalism on steroids where the system that is designed to keep the poor remaining poor and the rich stay rich. It’s a trap and had for anyone to break off.   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog #4 - Somatic Marker Theroy

Image
Simple, we have an amazing ability to make opinions based on emotions. The somatic marker theory suggests that we can remember ideas, feelings, and emotions to particular events and situations that make us formulate opinions on the situation. The way we interact with the world, stimuli refer to our senses, (sight, touch, taste, smell, hearing) these are the sensory processes that tell the brain what to think in response to an Input, of which would be a situation (eating cake, being in a car crash), then the brain is the central processor that decides for an action, the brain does this thousands of times a day. In the end, it outputs out a motor process of in this case is an active memory, so when the same memory is repeated in life it can kick out the same motor response of emotion and reaction. By definition, we can say it is 'The link between emotions and decisions making. Damasio concludes that your choices are steered by your emotions.' - Our psychol
Read more

Blog #13 – Mastermind

When playing the game ‘mastermind’ in class I can make some connections when scaling the ideas up to the scale of magnitude that covers the whole entire world. The first aspect to talk about is about the idea of if the leader was nature the players in the game won’t they be essentially anything with a soul, it's not so much watching scientists struggle to make sense of observations but more so to create the observations for people to see. And the code created by nature that is the observation it dictates, it waits then on people to discover that sight, its nothing really to figure out but it is something we can eventually observe by chance or just pure luck. The role of the hypothesis is to formulate an accurate thought when we think we are accustomed to the if… then… because… the format of a question, where based on the past, the next move is... because of the feedback from ‘the world’. Then it becomes a trial and error play until the desired outcome is eventually achie
Read more